01 March 2015

Random thoughts about the "end of the world"...

I think I've found the solution to all of our problems...


If you haven't felt it by now we have somewhat of a series of serious problems going on with how our planet affords the resources AND conditions necessary for life as we know it to push forward. The following are major issues every human should be aware of and they are (Rockström et al., 2009):


  1. climate change
  2. ocean acidification
  3. chemical pollution
  4. rate of biodiversity loss
  5. land-system change
  6. global freshwater-use
  7. stratospheric ozone depletion
  8. atmospheric aerosol loading
  9. change in biogeochemical flows (such as carbon and nitrogen cycling)


The human-induced Anthropocene (Crutzen, 2002) is increasing in amplitude and how the planet continues to respond is a guess that even the most prominent probabilists are having trouble keeping up with (weather forecastingfor example). So what's our role in all of this?





An example of 500 mbar geopotential height and absolute vorticity prediction from a numerical weather prediction model.




Human beings have been blessed with a neocortex that has offered us the capability to survive through some rather treacherous times. This ability allows us to think, and reason.











We live in a world that is shaped by the aggregation of our collective works and actions. This idea could also lend itself to all other organisms who work alongside our own efforts in creating a system of chemical exchange that allows us to both breathe and build monuments of human proportion. 

Now how does this apply to the computer screen you're looking at? The screen in front of you came from extracted resources from all over the world. Not only did the extraction of those resources create chemical changes, but so too did the manufacture, distribution, and actual use of the very screen in front of you. Touch it. What you're feeling is the work of hundreds of other human beings passing things around just this screen could be in front of you. Pretty nifty, but what questions should we be asking in the process of our materialized and manufactured world?

It's pretty obvious that all of the materials we touch, use, and purchase came from somewhere and will go to somewhere else. Most of us do not think twice about this process let alone recognize if there is any actual sort of natural breakdown cycle to these products once they are produced. This is another aspect of our bigger problem. Many of us use resources in ways that only serve our microcosmic necessities and therefore it's difficult to see how everything ties together. I beg to ask the question, are we aware of the bigger global impact of our consumer needs, are we ignorant to these impacts, or are we unaware of the role we play? I believe in the collective efficacy of the human spirit and the ability we have to do great things (#optimism101). We must hold one another accountable if we're going to have a realistic shot at changing the direction we're going in (which really isn't that good right now).



Tough questions but questions we need to be asking ourselves if we're going to have any chance of avoiding a regression* of treacherous times.


*ORIGIN late Middle English (as a noun): from Latin regressus, from regredi ‘go back, return,’ from re- ‘back’ + gradi ‘walk.’


















So how can we begin to change our behavior so that we lessen our negative impacts on the planet?


I would argue that the first step is to recognize how it is that we, ourselves, contribute. This is probably the most difficult part as this takes a level of metacognition and self-reflection that many of us have not be given the skill-set to accomplish. But this is an illusion. We do have an intrinsic sense to think about ourselves in the living world but unless we dedicate time toward practicing higher levels of awareness and compassion, it will never be fully realized. Just because we can do something doesn't mean we're actually doing it.




















So....here we are looking at global problems with a touch of our own psychology. How can we begin to assess our own behavior to make changes? Do we feel we need to make a change?



Changing behavior, if needed, will require making tough decisions as the pattern of our lifestyle could change (this isn't always a bad thing, think of addicts who have successfully detached from their vices). I found the following to be an interesting approach to making wise and humanely decisions. Consider how Benjamin Franklin suggested the following advice to the British scientist Joseph Priestley about how to make a difficult choice:
My way is to divide half a sheet of paper by a line into two columns, writing over the one Pro, and over the other Con. Then, during three or four days consideration, I put down under the different heads short hints of the different motives, that at different times occur to me, for or against each measure … I find at length where the balance lies; and if, after a day or two of further consideration, nothing new that is of importance occurs on either side, I come to a determination accordingly … When each [reason] is thus considered, separately and comparatively, and the whole lies before me, I think I can judge better, and am less likely to make a rash step. (Wilson & Schooler, 1991; Goodman, 1945, p. 746).
Global problems do need our attention and the best way to get in the game is to see where you're positioned. Let's think for a second and make a list of the planetary problems listed earlier. Let's ask ourselves what do we know of these problems, what is our impact, and what can we do to make things better? Join me and give it a try. Can you think of what these problems mean and how they may affect you and your lifestyle? I'm going to pause and cogitate on my own role....














~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415(6867), 23–23.

Goodman, N. G. (Ed.), (1945). A Benjamin Franklin reader. New York. Crowell.

Rockström, J., Steffen, W. L., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E., ... & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity.

Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 181–192.


17 February 2015

A weekend of Love...

Today was a busy one. Drove home after a weekend in Las Vegas and what a weekend it was! A combination of Cirque du Soleil, hiking the Red Rocks, and bonding with someone who reveals the world to me in ways I could never envision on my own.







It was about a 4-hour drive and I returned home just in time for class and a council meeting. What a friggin' world we live in. One minute I'm listening to climate change injustices committed against indigenous peoples and the next I'm speaking in front of city council to discuss the banishment of single-use plastic bags.

I, for one, am grateful that we live in a time where public participation CAN influence how society operates. Consider the origin of the word: democracy.


ORIGIN late 16th cent.: from French démocratie, via late Latin from Greek dēmokratia, from dēmos ‘the people’ + -kratia ‘power, rule.’

To realize that we still have a chance to give our 2 cents for what we think the world should be is what is missing from our collective cognition. Like a sleeping drug that dopes our day-to-day consciousness, we focus our energies on satisfying impulses rather than contemplating space and time. Our attention is sacrificed for the moment-to-moment rush to go nowhere.

Hmm, well. It's getting late and I have another full day ahead of me. I would like to get around to discussing my research at some point but not tonight. What I can say is that I think the role of science education in today's society appears to meet more than the eye can capture...

10 February 2015

Where is Science heading? (thesis writing practice 1)

I am in the process of researching and developing my master's thesis where I'll look at science education and the role of motivation toward ethical practices and global awareness. The following journal entries are rough sketches for what will be later fleshed out in a more refined fashion.

For context, uppercase "Science" is the subjective form and idea of science, the lower case "science" is the praxis (combination of theory and practice) of science. So if I say that Science gave birth to science then I am referring to the philosophy and idea of Science giving birth to the industrial practice of science. Hopefully that will become clear.

I find myself in a fascinating space of inquiry, integrity, and pace. I am collecting research for a study I'll be conducting next fall semester at Northern Arizona University. I would like to better understand the following: what do students in a college-level science course think of ethical practices, societal* obligations, and their role in the greater contribution of Science?

*Occasionally I like to refer back to the oldest recorded meaning of a word to gain a deeper context about what we're talking about. The asterisk in the previous paragraph is to define: society = ORIGIN mid 16th cent. (in the sense ‘companionship, friendly association with others’): from French société, from Latin societas, from socius ‘companion.’  via New Oxford American Dictionary.

How do these science students interpret Science? Do they see a difference between "bad" science and "good" science?

Ideas have been swirling inside my head for some time now about the role of science and how the education of Science-related topics are being carried out. Thus far, I have researched both Richard Tarnas' The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the ideas that have shaped our world view and David Orr's Earth in Mind to gain a deeper understanding of how science has become such a utilized practice and what this means for humanity. Both authors may seem rather alarmist at first but the research does show both great and disastrous deeds carried out in the name of Science. Tarnas observed:

"The same science that had dramatically lessened the hazards and burdens of human survival now presented to human survival its gravest menace."

Let's think of that statement like this...

On the one hand we have the following:
Astronomy passing down an old tale from Ptolemy's (90 AD-168 AD) understanding of the universe as it orbits around the Earth...
....only to be challenged later by Copernicus (late-1400s/early-1500s) that the Earth is not at the center, that perhaps our Sun is.
Physics teaching us that the Earth's rotation gives meaning to its gravitational field.

Chemistry allowing us to see how matter and energy combine to give us life and the surroundings of our world.


Geology helping us realize that even mountains are not forever.  

Hydrology giving us clues how water can vanish into thin air.

Biology showing us how Life really operates.
Ecology begging us to realize the interconnectedness of Life here on Earth.

Human beings are curious animals with a vast ocean of knowledge splashing at our feet. Pretty amazing if you stop and think for a minute just how much we've learned through exploration and a relentless pursuit for greater truths...




But we've also wielded the mighty force of Science to do other things:


Atomic bombs taking the lives of thousands of people (picture of the Nagasaki atomic bomb ending World War II). 
Byproducts of human-engineered economies. Economy: ORIGIN late 15th cent. (in the sense ‘management of material resources’): from French économie, or via Latin from Greek oikonomia ‘household management,’ based on oikos ‘house’ + nemein ‘manage.’ Current senses date from the 17th cent.
Chemical pollution.
Smock stacks converting our atmosphere into a more toxic and carbon dioxide heavy mixture.

Maybe this might be a good time for mindful rumination....

In my next journal entry I'd like to respond to a journal article entitled Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for Humanity by Rockström et al. regarding the following global issues of our time:
  1. Chemical pollution
  2. Ocean acidification
  3. Rate of biodiversity loss
  4. Atmospheric aerosol loading
  5. Stratospheric ozone depletion
  6. Biogeochemical flows
  7. Global freshwater use
  8. Land-use change
  9. Climate change